c++ - O(n) sorting algorithm -


here's horrible sorting algorithm works on integers ranging 0 size. wouldn't use such algorithm on large set of data or 1 large numbers in because require memory. consider, wouldn't algorithm technically run in o(n) time?

thanks

#include <iostream> #define size 33  int main(){      int b[size];      int a[size] = {1,6,32,9,3,7,4,22,5,2,1,0};      (int n=0; n<size; n++) b[n] = 0;      (int n=0; n<size; n++){         if (size <= a[n]) throw std::logic_error("error");         b[a[n]]++;     }      int x = 0;     (int n=0; n<size; n++){         (int t=0; t<b[n]; t++){             a[x] = n;             x++;         }     }      (int n=0; n<size; n++) printf("%d ",a[n]); } 

you're showing variation on radix sort. along bucket sort, these algorithms prime examples of sorting not based on comparison, can offer better complexity o(n logn).

do note, however, implementation o(n + size).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

angular - Is it possible to get native element for formControl? -

unity3d - Rotate an object to face an opposite direction -

javascript - Why jQuery Select box change event is now working? -